How to prepare OEM Agreements in China?

August 16, 2009

Needless to say, China has become the world’s leading manufacturing base. However, with the recent product safety scares and the constant media attention, “Made in China” has become a high-profile issue for consumers and retailers. So how does a foreign company minimize the risks of tainted/substandard products manufactured in China? In this article, we discuss contract terms which foreign companies should consider when entering into OEM relationships with Chinese suppliers. (While we highlight some of what we feel are the main issues to be covered by the agreement, we recognize that each case is unique and there is no such thing as a ‘typical’ OEM arrangement.)

Standard Form Agreements

Generally, an OEM will have a standard form agreement which they are more than willing to provide to foreign companies who wish to use their services. While this may lower costs at the outset and allow the foreign company to ‘build favor’ with their Chinese counterpart, using such an agreement is almost never advisable, and foreign companies would be wise to consult counsel, who will assist the foreign company to properly negotiate and prepare agreements.

Note that we often advise that the written agreement is preceded by preparation and negotiation on the basis of a business term sheet, which will outline the major terms of cooperation. The agreed points in the term sheet then serve as the basis for the written agreement.

Major Terms of Agreement

Below, we highlight several major (though non-exhaustive) terms which should be included in an OEM Agreement:

1. Products and Specifications: The products to be manufactured should be well-defined in the agreement, along with product specifications which should be described in detail in appendix(es).

2. Forecasts and Binding Purchase/Supply Commitments: As OEM Agreements often require that firm orders are placed through Purchase Orders, in order to ensure that there is a binding supply/purchase commitment in the agreement itself, the parties will often designate a certain minimum commitment on both sides, to produce and purchase a certain amount of product within a given time period. Aside from the minimum requirement, the buyer will often provide a non-binding forecast to supplier, such that supplier can plan and allocate adequate resources (often 6-, 12-, 18-, 24- month terms).

3. Price: For those products designated as described previously, the parties should determine firm prices, which will either be effective throughout the term of the agreement, or at least a portion thereof, subject to (we recommend) maximum periodic price increases. Further, it is beneficial to include for discounts upon meeting certain pre-determined purchase volumes.

4. Quality Control: Buyer and supplier will agree on certain terms afforded to buyer/required of seller for conducting quality control on production. Typical terms include i) access (often on short or no notice) to production sites, and ii) random testing of each batch of products. Further, the parties may, depending on the value of the contract, provide for a representative of the buyer to be on-site on a full-time/regular basis, for the purpose of assisting in quality control. (The buyer’s representative may also monitor supplier’s use of intellectual property and other improper dealings, though their effectiveness will invariably depend on his/her loyalty to the buyer.)

5. Term: The parties will determine an appropriate term for their contract, and may make the agreement renewable on request by buyer. This term should be sufficiently long so as to ensure that buyer’s initial investment can be adequately recovered.

6. Termination: Termination events, as in most agreements, will include those events which give rise to immediate termination rights (for example, unauthorized use of buyer’s intellectual property and violation of non-compete terms), and those which require a notice period and the breaching party’s right to remedy the breach (failure to supply products meeting specifications).

7. Consequences of Termination: In the event of termination, it is important for buyer specify those procedures necessary to protect its rights in the event of such occurrence. Often terms will include: sale of completed products to buyer, allowance for completion of partially completed products and sale to buyer, destruction or return of confidential information, and destruction or return of trademarks, logos, brochures, and other advertising materials.

8. Examination and Acceptance: Upon delivery of the products to buyer, it will be afforded a certain period to conduct inspection, subject to deemed acceptance in the event that a claim is not made within a certain period. Further, it is common for suppliers to require that upon buyer’s acceptance of the products, they will be absolved of all further liabilities. Note that we do not recommend that buyers wholly accept such terms (and provide a minimum carve-out and continued warranty), as buyer, after acceptance, will have little grounds for a claim (even for the use of sub-standard materials which are often difficult to visually detect).

9. Raw Materials/Components: As part of the quality control process, buyer should require that supplier provide a list of its suppliers along with purchase orders over a pre-set period to ensure that the agreed upon raw materials/components are being used.

10. Insurance: Due to the relatively unsophisticated nature of manufacturers/insurance industry in China, factories are often severely underinsured from risks. As a result, it is advisable for buyer to require that supplier obtain a minimum level of insurance.

11. Intellectual Property: All intellectual property used to manufacture the product, including trademarks, patents, copyrights, and other business secrets should be licensed to supplier, for the limited purposes of complying with its obligations under the agreement. Further, buyer should carefully draft related terms so as to restrict supplier from exercising any rights of ownership to the licensed IP.

12. Non-compete: As an OEM relationship necessarily involves substantial transfer of intellectual property and confidential information, buyer must not only be careful to ensure that additional products are not produced by the supplier, but also by its affiliated companies and senior directors and management. (Note that the implications of failing to adequately provide for such terms may result in not only the product being sold in China but more importantly in the same markets as buyer, and at significantly lower costs.)

13. Arbitration: As manufacturing tends to be concentrated in lesser-developed regions in China in addition to cost/time/reliability benefits often associated with arbitration, we advise clients to select arbitration for dispute resolution. Arbitration can be conducted in China or internationally (in any New York Convention signatory state), though domestic arbitration allows buyer access to Chinese courts for injunctive relief.

Arguably more or at least equally important as negotiating and concluding a strong contract, buyer must be carefully monitor and enforce of its terms when necessary.

Finally, although long-term relations are often desirable and we encourage buyers to find and work with reliable suppliers, as a practical matter it is imperative that buyers ensure that they have one or more alternative suppliers, in the event of required termination of the primary OEM supply arrangement.

Source: China Law Practices

http://wwwchinalawpracticeblog.com

Tags: , ,
Related Posts:

Settlement of Employment Termination

July 8, 2009

It is common practice for an employee and employer to attempt to negotiate the monetary amount that the employer is required to pay the employee upon termination of employment. Any agreement in such circumstances will generally involve an employer paying an amount equivalent to its potential legal liability or lower. However, a question arises as to whether, under China’s Labour Contract Law, such an agreement is enforceable if an employee ultimately reneges on its agreement and takes the dispute to labour arbitration. The notion of free will and  fair bargaining underpin Chinese contract law and the Chinese legal system in general.  Accordingly, there may be such occasions where such an agreement could be struck down by the  P. R. of  China court.

It is advised that employers that it is  in their interest to avoid labour arbitration as,  in most cases, it favors the interests of employees. Further, in labour arbitration and litigation in China there is little possibility of recovering your legal costs and, accordingly, even if you are ultimately successful,  there is a strong likelihood that you will  incur legal expenses  greater  than the potential liability. For these reasons, many employers make every effort to settle matters with employees. The assumption is that in coming to an agreement with an employee, arbitration will be avoided.

Article 5 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Labor Dispute Mediation and Arbitration states that labour arbitration is available “where a labor dispute arises, if a party does not desire a consultation, the parties fail to settle the dispute through consultation, or a party  does not execute a reached settlement agreement”. It seems, on the face of the matter, that where there is an agreement between the parties, there is no jurisdiction for the dispute to go to labour arbitration.

If an employee reaches an agreement with an employer regarding the termination of the labor contract and the economic compensation is far from the statutory standards, generally the agreement shall be deemed as invalid because it exempts the employer from statutory liability

and extinguishes the rights of the employee. The concepts of free-will and fair bargaining are critical principles underpinning Chinese Contract Law, particularly in the employment context. Article 4 of the Contract Law provides that ‘[t]he parties have the right to lawfully enter into a contract of their own free will in accordance with the law, and no unit or individual may illegally interfere therewith.’ Further, Article 3 of the Labour Contract Law provides that ‘[t]he principle of lawfulness, fairness, equality, free will, negotiation for agreement and good faith shall be observed in the formation of a labor contract.’ Whilst a settlement agreement in relation to economic compensation payable to an employee is not technically a “labour contract”, the matters outlined in Article 3 reflect common principles. Accordingly, where the agreed amount is well below the legal entitlement it will be difficult for the employer to show that the principles of fair-bargaining existed. In such circumstances, after an employee obtains economic compensation according to the agreement, if the employee applies for arbitration or files a suit to ask the employer pay the balance of the legal entitlement, the application shall be supported.

It is clear that the critical issue is whether there is fair-bargaining between the parties. As such, if the agreement stipulates the calculation methods and standards of economic compensation and the employee acknowledges that the agreed economic compensation is far from statutory standards, it shall be deemed that the employee has disposed of his or her rights, and any application to alter the terms of the agreement would be rejected. Further, if after an employee obtains economic compensation in accordance with an agreement with an employer, he or she applies for arbitration or files a suit beyond the statutory limitation period (it should be noted that the statutory limitation period is 1 year from the date of termination) for the balance of the employer’s legal liability, the employees rights shall be extinguished.

NancySun, Attorney & MatthewMcKee, Foreign Legal Counsel

Tags: , ,
Related Posts:

Contract Damages

June 20, 2009

Chinese contract law is far more flexible with respect to remedies than the common law since it is based on civil law. China makes no distinction between law and equity. As a result, in addition to money damages, Chinese law provides for specific performance, contract liquidated damages, deposit, loss of bargain damages and incidental damages. Most importantly, the use of one remedy does not exclude the application of another remedy. For example, if contract damages are not sufficient to compensate for a party’s actual damages, Article 114 of the Contract Law provides that the injured party can request that the court order payment of an amount sufficient to allow for complete relief. However, to prevent abuse, the reverse is also true. Contract Law Article 114 provides that where stipulated contract damages are “excessively higher than actual damages”, the defendant may request a reduction in the amount. Explanation 29 provides that an amount 130% higher than actual damages will generally be considered “excessively high.” However, the burden of proof in establishing the amount of actual damages is on the defendant. In the absence of clear proof, there is a strong tendency for Chinese courts to accept the stipulated contract damage amount.

Tags: , ,
Related Posts: